-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fizz] Fix root segment IDs #27371
Merged
Merged
[Fizz] Fix root segment IDs #27371
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
Opened by a member of the React Core Team
labels
Sep 14, 2023
Comparing: 95c9554...f95256a Critical size changesIncludes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:
Significant size changesIncludes any change greater than 0.2%: Expand to show
|
acdlite
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2023
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
Typically we assign IDs lazily when flushing to minimize the ids we have to assign and we try to maximize inlining. When we prerender we could always flush into a buffer before returning but that's not actually what we do right now. We complete rendering before returning but we don't actually run the flush path until someone reads the resulting stream. We assign IDs eagerly when something postpone so that we can refer to those ids in the holes without flushing first. This leads to some interesting conditions that needs to consider this. This PR also deals with rootSegmentId which is the ID of the segment that contains the body of a Suspense boundary. The boundary needs to know this in addition to the Suspense Boundary's ID to know how to inject the root segment into the boundary. Why is the suspense boundary ID and the rootSegmentID just not the same ID? Why don't segments and suspense boundary not share ID namespace? That's a good question and I don't really remember. It might not be a good reason and maybe they should just be the same. DiffTrain build for [a6e4791](a6e4791)
acdlite
added a commit
to acdlite/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
React upstream changes: - facebook/react#27374 - facebook/react#27369 - facebook/react#27372 - facebook/react#27371 - facebook/react#27370 - facebook/react#27321 - facebook/react#27368 - facebook/react#27367 - facebook/react#27366 - facebook/react#27360 - facebook/react#27361 - facebook/react#27357 - facebook/react#27359 - facebook/react#27358 - facebook/react#27330 - facebook/react#27347 - facebook/react#27307 - facebook/react#27346 - facebook/react#27342 - facebook/react#27340 - facebook/react#27328 - facebook/react#27327 - facebook/react#27325 - facebook/react#27337 - facebook/react#27336 - facebook/react#27323 - facebook/react#27320 - facebook/react#27317 - facebook/react#27318 - facebook/react#27316 - facebook/react#27313 - facebook/react#27309 - facebook/react#27302 - facebook/react#27297 - facebook/react#27295 - facebook/react#27305 - facebook/react#27215 - facebook/react#27304 - facebook/react#27067 - facebook/react#27179 - facebook/react#27278 - facebook/react#27277 - facebook/react#27282 - facebook/react#27230 - facebook/react#27260 - facebook/react#27270 - facebook/react#27273 - facebook/react#27268 - facebook/react#27269
acdlite
added a commit
to acdlite/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
React upstream changes: - facebook/react#27374 - facebook/react#27369 - facebook/react#27372 - facebook/react#27371 - facebook/react#27370 - facebook/react#27321 - facebook/react#27368 - facebook/react#27367 - facebook/react#27366 - facebook/react#27360 - facebook/react#27361 - facebook/react#27357 - facebook/react#27359 - facebook/react#27358 - facebook/react#27330 - facebook/react#27347 - facebook/react#27307 - facebook/react#27346 - facebook/react#27342 - facebook/react#27340 - facebook/react#27328 - facebook/react#27327 - facebook/react#27325 - facebook/react#27337 - facebook/react#27336 - facebook/react#27323 - facebook/react#27320 - facebook/react#27317 - facebook/react#27318 - facebook/react#27316 - facebook/react#27313 - facebook/react#27309 - facebook/react#27302 - facebook/react#27297 - facebook/react#27295 - facebook/react#27305 - facebook/react#27215 - facebook/react#27304 - facebook/react#27067 - facebook/react#27179 - facebook/react#27278 - facebook/react#27277 - facebook/react#27282 - facebook/react#27230 - facebook/react#27260 - facebook/react#27270 - facebook/react#27273 - facebook/react#27268 - facebook/react#27269
acdlite
added a commit
to acdlite/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
React upstream changes: - facebook/react#27374 - facebook/react#27369 - facebook/react#27372 - facebook/react#27371 - facebook/react#27370 - facebook/react#27321 - facebook/react#27368 - facebook/react#27367 - facebook/react#27366 - facebook/react#27360 - facebook/react#27361 - facebook/react#27357 - facebook/react#27359 - facebook/react#27358 - facebook/react#27330 - facebook/react#27347 - facebook/react#27307 - facebook/react#27346 - facebook/react#27342 - facebook/react#27340 - facebook/react#27328 - facebook/react#27327 - facebook/react#27325 - facebook/react#27337 - facebook/react#27336 - facebook/react#27323 - facebook/react#27320 - facebook/react#27317 - facebook/react#27318 - facebook/react#27316 - facebook/react#27313 - facebook/react#27309 - facebook/react#27302 - facebook/react#27297 - facebook/react#27295 - facebook/react#27305 - facebook/react#27215 - facebook/react#27304 - facebook/react#27067 - facebook/react#27179 - facebook/react#27278 - facebook/react#27277 - facebook/react#27282 - facebook/react#27230 - facebook/react#27260 - facebook/react#27270 - facebook/react#27273 - facebook/react#27268 - facebook/react#27269
kodiakhq bot
pushed a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2023
### React upstream changes: - facebook/react#27374 - facebook/react#27369 - facebook/react#27372 - facebook/react#27371 - facebook/react#27370 - facebook/react#27321 - facebook/react#27368 - facebook/react#27367 - facebook/react#27366 - facebook/react#27360 - facebook/react#27361 - facebook/react#27357 - facebook/react#27359 - facebook/react#27358 - facebook/react#27330 - facebook/react#27347 - facebook/react#27307 - facebook/react#27346 - facebook/react#27342 - facebook/react#27340 - facebook/react#27328 - facebook/react#27327 - facebook/react#27325 - facebook/react#27337 - facebook/react#27336 - facebook/react#27323 - facebook/react#27320 - facebook/react#27317 - facebook/react#27318 - facebook/react#27316 - facebook/react#27313 - facebook/react#27309 - facebook/react#27302 - facebook/react#27297 - facebook/react#27295 - facebook/react#27305 - facebook/react#27215 - facebook/react#27304 - facebook/react#27067 - facebook/react#27179 - facebook/react#27278 - facebook/react#27277 - facebook/react#27282 - facebook/react#27230 - facebook/react#27260 - facebook/react#27270 - facebook/react#27273 - facebook/react#27268 - facebook/react#27269
EdisonVan
pushed a commit
to EdisonVan/react
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
Typically we assign IDs lazily when flushing to minimize the ids we have to assign and we try to maximize inlining. When we prerender we could always flush into a buffer before returning but that's not actually what we do right now. We complete rendering before returning but we don't actually run the flush path until someone reads the resulting stream. We assign IDs eagerly when something postpone so that we can refer to those ids in the holes without flushing first. This leads to some interesting conditions that needs to consider this. This PR also deals with rootSegmentId which is the ID of the segment that contains the body of a Suspense boundary. The boundary needs to know this in addition to the Suspense Boundary's ID to know how to inject the root segment into the boundary. Why is the suspense boundary ID and the rootSegmentID just not the same ID? Why don't segments and suspense boundary not share ID namespace? That's a good question and I don't really remember. It might not be a good reason and maybe they should just be the same.
bigfootjon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2024
Typically we assign IDs lazily when flushing to minimize the ids we have to assign and we try to maximize inlining. When we prerender we could always flush into a buffer before returning but that's not actually what we do right now. We complete rendering before returning but we don't actually run the flush path until someone reads the resulting stream. We assign IDs eagerly when something postpone so that we can refer to those ids in the holes without flushing first. This leads to some interesting conditions that needs to consider this. This PR also deals with rootSegmentId which is the ID of the segment that contains the body of a Suspense boundary. The boundary needs to know this in addition to the Suspense Boundary's ID to know how to inject the root segment into the boundary. Why is the suspense boundary ID and the rootSegmentID just not the same ID? Why don't segments and suspense boundary not share ID namespace? That's a good question and I don't really remember. It might not be a good reason and maybe they should just be the same. DiffTrain build for commit a6e4791.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Typically we assign IDs lazily when flushing to minimize the ids we have to assign and we try to maximize inlining.
When we prerender we could always flush into a buffer before returning but that's not actually what we do right now. We complete rendering before returning but we don't actually run the flush path until someone reads the resulting stream. We assign IDs eagerly when something postpone so that we can refer to those ids in the holes without flushing first.
This leads to some interesting conditions that needs to consider this.
This PR also deals with rootSegmentId which is the ID of the segment that contains the body of a Suspense boundary. The boundary needs to know this in addition to the Suspense Boundary's ID to know how to inject the root segment into the boundary.
Why is the suspense boundary ID and the rootSegmentID just not the same ID? Why don't segments and suspense boundary not share ID namespace? That's a good question and I don't really remember. It might not be a good reason and maybe they should just be the same.